Kevin Zeese U.S. Senate Exploratory Committee
Home Contribute Sign Up Tell Friends Issues Biography Contact Us Press Photos Search Zeese Gear
Zeese Videos
The First Debate in Maryland Senate Race between Zeese, Steele and Cardin

Code

Upcoming Events
Please check the Full Calendar for upcoming events:
View Full Calendar
Political Party Nominations





Why Not Ben CardinWhy Not Steele
click on one to find out about either of their records.


Click a format
to view XML source
for use in your page.
Zeese Criticizes Cardin for Shirking Responsibility on Iraq War PDF  | Print |  E-mail
Monday, 28 November 2005
For Immediate Release
November 28, 2005

For Further Information:
Linda Schade 301-257-3847


Today, Kevin Zeese expressed “grave concerns” regarding Rep. Ben Cardin's “lack of leadership and your pro-war votes on the Iraq War.”

Zeese pointed out that Rep. Cardin is remaining silent on the Iraq War while U.S. troops are dying and the U.S. treasury is being depleted saying: “Now you are standing by and allowing President Bush to proceed in conducting an ill conceived, poorly executed war based on lies, deceptions and falsehoods. This is shirking your constitutional responsibility.”


Zeese concludes urging Rep. Cardin to participate in a candidate forum with all declared candidates for the Senate.


Kevin Zeese is running independent of the two major parties. He is the leader of the national anti-war group DemocracyRising.US. Below is his letter to Rep. Cardin and a list of his recent publications on the Iraq War.

 
# # #

 

November 28, 2005


 

The Honorable Congressman Ben Cardin
2207 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515
fax: 202-225-9219

Dear Rep. Cardin:

I am writing to express my grave concerns regarding your lack of leadership and your pro-war votes on the Iraq War. According to comments made on your behalf by your spokesman to the Associated Press on November 24 your plan is to abdicate your congressional responsibility to Maryland taxpayers and voters by leaving it to President Bush to decide. Your spokesperson, Oren Shur told AP:


“'. . . he's repeatedly called on President Bush to bring the American people a plan to bring our troops home safely and responsibly as soon as possible.'

“But Cardin believes it is Bush who needs to establish the timetable.”

Every day U.S. troops and Iraqi civilians are dying, every week billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars are spent and Iraq continues to be a recruitment and training ground for terrorists – making the United States less secure. Surely, you are not seeking to represent Maryland in the U.S. Senate in order to merely stand on the sidelines letting President Bush decide while you watch the daily disaster unfold.

Congress has the constitutional responsibility to declare war. Regarding the Iraq War no declaration of war ever occurred. Yet, you have consistently voted to fund this illegal war and voted against even the development of an exit strategy.

  • On May 25, 2005 you voted against the Woolsey Amendment, which simply expressed “the sense of Congress that the President should develop a plan for the withdrawal of U.S. military forces from Iraq, and submit this plan to the congressional defense committees.” Note this amendment did not create an exit strategy it merely required the president to do so. This is inconsistent with the comments of your spokesperson. Where do you actually stand?

  • On July 20, 2005 you voted for the House Resolution authored by Bush supporter Rep. Ileana Ross-Lehtinen (R- Florida), which specified that the U. S. must not withdraw from Iraq until “it is clear that United States national security and foreign policy goals relating to a free and stable Iraq have been or are about to be achieved.” Your support for this resolution puts you in President Bush's camp on the Iraq War as it authorizes the President to keep U.S. troops in Iraq indefinitely until he certifies these goals have been met. Again, your vote is with the President.

Even when you voted against the resolution authorizing the use of force you straddled the fence by voting the wrong way on three amendments the same day:

    • You voted for the Spratt Amendment, which would have given Bush a provisional two-step war authorization: step 1, the President would have been authorized to go to the UN Security Council with a use of force resolution to pressure them to allow inspectors in; if the UN said no, or if the UN said yes but the inspectors weren't allowed in, then the President would have to follow step 2, return to Congress for a second vote to actually commit troops to battle.

    • You voted against the Lee amendment, which was designed to continue containment and begin negotiations; and

    • You voted against the Kucinich Motion to Recommit which would have sent the Resolution back to committee with instructions to come up with estimated death tolls, estimated casualties, the environmental and economic costs of war, an exit plan, and so on.


Now you are standing by and allowing President Bush to proceed in conducting an ill conceived, poorly executed war based on lies, deceptions and falsehoods. This is shirking your constitutional responsibility.

On this important issue you need to let Maryland voters know where you really stand.I urge you to participate in a candidate forum on the Iraq War issue – including all declared candidates for the U.S. Senate. Silence by those seeking office on this critical issue is unacceptable.

Sincerely,
Kevin Zeese
Candidate for U.S. Senate
301-257-3847

Iraqis United: The United States Must Leave -- describes how public opinion in Iraq wants the US out and how a recent statement of Iraqis from across the political spectrum also calls for withdrawal and supports resistence to occupation.
http://democracyrising.us/content/view/373/151/

Rep. Murtha Calls for Immediate Withdrawal -- examines the rationale and impact of Murtha's call for a withdrawal ending in six months (points out how it is the same thing Democracy Rising has called for for more than a year). http://democracyrising.us/content/view/368/151/

Edwards Recants War Vote Suggests First Step to Iraq Exit – Remove US Corporate Interests -- describes John Edwards new view on the Iraq War (based on a op-ed he wrote in The Post) and how he points to a new first step, remove U.S. corporate interests from Iraq and give Iraq back its economy. http://democracyrising.us/content/view/367/151/

One Year Anniversary of Fallujah -- examines claims that the US used chemical weapons in Fallujah.  This is something I've been writing about for nearly a year. http://democracyrising.us/content/view/360/151/

Mainstream American Military, Foreign Service and Intelligence Leadership Says No to the Iraq War -- describes how the Iraq War is opposed by the mainstream foreign policy leadership in the US -- quoting generals, admirals, national security advisors and foreign policy leadership. http://democracyrising.us/content/view/359/151/

 

< Prev   Next >
How You Can Help



E-Newsletter Signup
Join Z-Action List
  • Up-to-date Campaign Information
  • Discuss Strategy and Tactics
  • Learn How to Help!
Sign up by sending a blank email to: Z-Action-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Zeese Gear
Code

Raise Awareness at Your College


Website Design by Kilroy Was Here

Paid for by Kevin Zeese for U.S. Senate